[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Indexing & Abstracting::
Publication Ethics::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Indexing & Abstracting
DOAJ
GOOGLE SCHOLAR
..
:: Volume 28, Issue 3 (4-2023) ::
__Armaghane Danesh__ 2023, 28(3): 371-385 Back to browse issues page
Two Centers Affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
M Alizadeh Nayini1 , A Molvi1 , M Ghorbani2 , F Banaei 3
1- Department of Internal Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Torbat Heydarieh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydarieh, Iran
3- Department of Internal Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , dr.banaee@gmail.com
Abstract:   (760 Views)
Background & aim: Colonoscopy is the main method of colon examination. Acceptable bowel preparation plays an effective role in examining the bowel. Diagnosis and treatment of colon polyps or non-bulging lesions such as vascular malformations and serrated polyps depend on the degree of intestinal cleanliness at the time of assessment. On the other hand, insufficient preparation makes the evaluation more difficult, the evaluation is incomplete, increases the time of colonoscopy and the need to repeat the procedure, and this increases the cost. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to determine and prepare the large intestine for colonoscopy with pidrolox produced in Iran with and without Senagraf syrup in two centers affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.

Methods: In the present prospective, double-blind descriptive study conducted in 2016 on 273 patients in need of non-emergency colonoscopy referred to Shahid Motahari and Shahid Faqihi clinics of Shiraz, Iran, 227 patients were randomly selected into two drug (111) and control groups. (116) were categorized and studied. The effect of adding Senagraf to pidrolox manufactured in Iran with pidrolox along with placebo on the level of intestinal readiness (based on Ottawa scoring) in eligible patients (20-78 years old) who were willing to enter the study was investigated and compared. Collected data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-square statistical tests.

Results: The average score of intestinal cleanliness in whole and as well by different parts, in the drug group, was lower than the control group, which confirms better preparation (p=0.001). Compared to older people, younger people had cleaner intestines (p=0.001). The level of bowel preparation in female patients was also better than male patients (p=0.001). The travel time from the rectum to the cecum and the return time from the cecum to the rectum were significantly less than the control group (p=0.001). No significant side effects were observed in both groups.
 
Conclusion: Adding senna to Iranian polyethylene glycol (PEG) before colonoscopy increased bowel preparation and reduces colonoscopy time, without causing additional side effects.

 
Keywords: Colonoscopy, Bowel preparation, Ottawa, Polyethylene glycol, Senagraph
Full-Text [PDF 572 kb]   (175 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Internist
Received: 2023/03/13 | Accepted: 2023/05/28 | Published: 2023/05/28
References
1. Hillyer GC, Basch CH, Bach EC, Lebwohl B, Kestrinos F, Insel RJ, et al. Gastroenterologists' perceived barriers to optimal pre-colonoscopy bowel preporation: Result of a national survey. J Cancer Educ 2012; 27(3): 526-32.## [DOI:10.1007/s13187-012-0364-x] [PMID] []
2. Burke AC, Church MJ. Enhancing the quality of colonoscopy: the importance of bowel purgatives. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2007; 66(3): 565-73. ## [DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2007.03.1084] [PMID]
3. Kilgore TW, Abdinoor AA, Szary NM, Schowengerdt SW, Yust JB, Choudhary A, et al. Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2011; 73(6): 1240-5. ## [DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2011.02.007] [PMID]
4. Brethauer M, Kalager M. Colonoscopy as a triage screening test. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 759-76. ## [DOI:10.1056/NEJMe1114639] [PMID]
5. Valiante F, Pontone S, Hassan C, Bellumat A, Bona D.M, Zullo A, et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating a new 2-L PEG solution plus ascorbic acid VS. 4-LPEG for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 2012; 44 (3): 224-7. ## [DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2011.10.007] [PMID]
6. Beck ED. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2010; 23(1): 10-13. [DOI:10.1055/s-0030-1247851] [PMID] []
7. Sim JS, Koo, JS. Predictors of Inadequate Bowel Preparation and Salvage Options on Colonoscopy. Clin Endosc 2016; 49(4): 346-9. ## [DOI:10.5946/ce.2016.094] [PMID] []
8. Hernández G, Gimeno-García AZ, Quintero E. Strategies to improve inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Frontiers in Medicine 2019; 6: 245. ## [DOI:10.3389/fmed.2019.00245] [PMID] []
9. Mandolesi D, Frazzoni L, Bazzoli F, Fuccio L. The management of 'hard-to-prepare'colonoscopy patients. Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2017; 11(8): 731-40. ## [DOI:10.1080/17474124.2017.1338947] [PMID]
10. Kastenberg D, Bertiger G, Brogadir S. Bowel preparation quality scales for colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(26): 2833-43. ## [DOI:10.3748/wjg.v24.i26.2833] [PMID] []
11. Parente F, Marino B, Crosta C. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy in the era of mass screening for colo-rectal cancer: a practical approach. Dig Liver Dis 2009; 41(2): 87-95. ## [DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005] [PMID]
12. Zauber GA, Winawer JS, Obrien MJ, Lansdrop-Vogelaar I, Ballegooijen VM, Benjamin F, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer Deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687-96. ## [DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1100370] [PMID] []
13. Ben-Horin S, Bar-Meir S, Avidon B. The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 2680-5. [DOI:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01486.x] [PMID]
14. Lichtenstein G, Bowel Preparation for colonoscopy: a review. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2009; 66(1): 27-37. ## [DOI:10.2146/ajhp080084] [PMID]
15. Hookey L, Depew TW, Vanner JS. Combined low-volume polyethylene glycol solution plus stimulant laxatives versus standard-volume polyethylene glycol solution: A prospective, reandomized study of colon cleansing before colonoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol 2006; 20(2):101-5. ## [DOI:10.1155/2006/621367] [PMID] []
16. Desalvo L, Borgonovo G, Ansaldo GL, Varaldo E, Floris F, Assalino M, et al. The bowel cleansing for colonoscopy. A randomized trial comparing three methods. Ann Ital Chir 2006; 77(2): 143-6. ##
17. Bechtold LM, Choudhary A. Bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy: A continual search for excellence. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(2): 155-7. ## [DOI:10.3748/wjg.v19.i2.155] [PMID] []
18. Shavakhi A, Kianina M, Torabi G, Nemati A, Saeidian B, Hoseinzadeh M, et al. High close senna or polyethylene Glycol (PEG) for elective colonoscopy preparation: a prospective randomized investigator blinded clinical trial. J Res Med Sci 2011; 16 (2): 149-55. ##
19. Fatemi SR, Moghimi Dehkordi B, Masrat E, Zali MR. Colon cancer prevention strategy in the population at risk in Iran. Scientific Journal of Medical Organization of the Islamic Republic of Iran 2010; 28(4): 444-49. ##
20. Joseph DA, Meester RGS, Zauber AG, Manninen DL, Winges L, Dong FB, et al. Colorectal Cancer Screening: Estimated Future Colonoscopy Need and Current Volume and Capacity. Cancer 2016; 122(16): 2479-86. ## [DOI:10.1002/cncr.30070] [PMID] []
21. Young PE, Womeldorph CM, Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. Journal of Cancer 2013; 4(3): 217-26. ## [DOI:10.7150/jca.5829] [PMID] []
22. Walsh JME, Jonathan P, Terdiman JP. Colorectal cancer screening. Clinical Applications JAMA 2003; 289(10): 1297-302. ## [DOI:10.1001/jama.289.10.1297] [PMID]
23. Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, Chalasani N. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96(6): 1797-802. ## [DOI:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03874.x] [PMID]
24. Saltzman JR, Cash BD, Pasha SF, Early DS, Muthusamy VR, Khashab MA, et al. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2015; 81(4): 781-94. ## [DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.048] [PMID]
25. Clark BT, Rustagi T, Laine L. What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 2014; 109(11): 1714. ## [DOI:10.1038/ajg.2014.232] [PMID] []
26. Rutherford CC, Calderwood AH. Update on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2018; 16(1): 165-81. ## [DOI:10.1007/s11938-018-0165-3] [PMID]
27. Haapamäki MM, Lindström M, Sandzén B, Low-volume bowel preparation is inferior to standard 4 L polythyleneglycol. Surg Enclosc 2011; 25(3): 897-901. ## [DOI:10.1007/s00464-010-1293-6] [PMID]
28. Amato A, Radaelli F, Paggi S, Terruzzi V. Half doses of PEG-ES and senna vs. high-dose senna for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized, investigator-blinded trial. Official Journal of the American College of Gastroenterology| ACG 2010; 105(3): 675-81. ## [DOI:10.1038/ajg.2009.598] [PMID]
29. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC, The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. March 2009; 69(3): 620-5. ## [DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057] [PMID] []
30. Ribeiroa J, Nóbrega S, Cunha A. Polyps detection in colonoscopies. Procedia Computer Science 2022; 196: 477-84. ## [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.039]
31. Radaelli F, Meucci G, Imperia G, Spinizi G, Strocchi E, Terruzi V, et al. High-dose senna compared with conventional PEG-ES lavage as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial. Am J Gastroeterol 2005; 100(12): 2674-80. ## [DOI:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00335.x] [PMID]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Alizadeh Nayini M, Molvi A, Ghorbani M, Banaei F. Two Centers Affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. armaghanj 2023; 28 (3) :371-385
URL: http://armaghanj.yums.ac.ir/article-1-3458-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 28, Issue 3 (4-2023) Back to browse issues page
ارمغان دانش Armaghane Danesh
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4652