|
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) Regarding Radiation Protection Standards Among Interventional Radiology Staff in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province: A Descriptive-Analytical Study
|
M Fereidooni1   , S Borzoueisileh2 |
1- Student Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran,
2- Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran , sajadborzouei@gmail.com |
|
|
Abstract: (1261 Views) |
Background & aim: Ensuring that healthcare professionals possess adequate knowledge, positive attitudes, and standardized practices regarding radiation safety is paramount in high-risk environments such as angiography, CT angiography, and interventional operating suites. This study aimed to assess the levels of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) among interventional radiology staff in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province and to identify the demographic and professional factors influencing these outcomes.
Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study was conducted in 2024, involving 102 employees from interventional radiology departments across three hospitals in Yasuj, Dehdasht, and Gachsaran. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire covering demographic and occupational variables, radiation-related work experience, and history of radiation protection training. KAP scores were categorized into three levels: good, average, and poor. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, employing Chi-square tests, independent t-tests, and one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).
Results: The study population included 56 males (54.9%) and 46 females (45.1%). Overall, 49.0% of respondents demonstrated a "good" level of KAP. The mean total score was 102.6 ± 20.5, with specific mean scores for knowledge, attitude, and practice being 35.5 ± 10.2, 29.6 ± 4.3, and 37.5 ± 8.2, respectively. Total KAP, knowledge, and attitude scores showed significant statistical correlations with age and marital status (P < 0.05). Furthermore, education level and job titles significantly influenced the scores. Participants with more extensive general and radiation-specific work experience, as well as those who had completed both basic and advanced radiation protection training courses, achieved significantly higher scores.
Conclusion: These findings provide a valuable evidence base for healthcare policymakers to enhance radiation safety protocols and foster a robust safety culture in high-risk interventional settings. Since demographic and professional factors—particularly education, job title, and specialized experience—are key determinants of compliance with safety standards, implementing mandatory, periodic, and advanced radiation protection training programs is highly recommended.
|
|
| Keywords: Radiation protection, Interventional radiology, Occupational training, Knowledge, Attitude, Practice(KAP). |
|
|
Full-Text [PDF 720 kb]
(45 Downloads)
|
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Radiology
Received: 2025/04/8 | Accepted: 2025/09/3 | Published: 2026/02/3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Send email to the article author |
|
|
|
| Add your comments about this article |
|
|
|
